2.1: Quality Debt - The Silent Killer Behind Your Release Velocity
Test Management and Release Engineering Issac @ Shout + Co. Test Management and Release Engineering Issac @ Shout + Co.

2.1: Quality Debt - The Silent Killer Behind Your Release Velocity

For more than 20 years I have sat at the junction of delivery deadlines and quality gates, leading release trains, scrum teams, and test practices across banking, utilities, and public-sector programmes. When speed rules the roadmap, it is easy to forget that every unfinished story, every flaky test, and every untested edge case becomes tomorrow’s production incident.

I have made it my mission to help teams build quality in early, automate with purpose, and release without regret

Read More
2.2: Building a Board-Ready Business Case for Software Test Management and Release Engineering
Test Management and Release Engineering Issac @ Shout + Co. Test Management and Release Engineering Issac @ Shout + Co.

2.2: Building a Board-Ready Business Case for Software Test Management and Release Engineering

I have spent nearly two decades shepherding complex programmes across New Zealand's banking, energy, and government sectors from code-complete to confident go-live. In that time, I've worn every hat from Programme Test Manager to my current engagement as a Release Train Engineer for Fonterra.

Along the way, I have seen brilliant products stumble at the final hurdle because their quality narrative did not resonate with finance decision-makers.

Read More
2.3: What Business Criteria should I use when Shortlisting Test and Release Partners?
Test Management and Release Engineering Issac @ Shout + Co. Test Management and Release Engineering Issac @ Shout + Co.

2.3: What Business Criteria should I use when Shortlisting Test and Release Partners?

Selecting the wrong test-management and release-engineering partner is not a minor inconvenience – it can lock your organisation into tooling dead ends, perpetual licence fees, and brittle processes that stall every future release.

While price per day is easy to compare, it rarely predicts success. The smart move is to apply a transparent, evidence-based framework that weighs technical depth, delivery pedigree, and knowledge-transfer commitment against your strategic objectives.

Read More
2.4: Crafting a Risk-Proof Statement of Work for Test and Release Management
Test Management and Release Engineering Issac @ Shout + Co. Test Management and Release Engineering Issac @ Shout + Co.

2.4: Crafting a Risk-Proof Statement of Work for Test and Release Management

Winning an RFP feels like crossing the finish-line – until the lawyers arrive. The excitement of a preferred-vendor announcement can quickly sour when contractual ambiguities stall momentum, inflate risk, or pit sponsors against procurement. A clear, outcomes-oriented SOW is the antidote. It transforms enthusiasm into executable commitments, providing every stakeholder with an agreed playbook for pilot success, smooth scale-out and measurable ROI.

Read More
2.5: The First 90 Days – Locking in Wins and Scaling Your New Test & Release Capability
Test Management and Release Engineering Issac @ Shout + Co. Test Management and Release Engineering Issac @ Shout + Co.

2.5: The First 90 Days – Locking in Wins and Scaling Your New Test & Release Capability

Congratulations, the ink is dry – now the real work begins.

You have a signed Statement of Work, a green-lit budget, and sky-high expectations.

The next 90 days will determine whether your new Software Test Management and Release Engineering capability becomes a lighthouse success or another shelf-ware statistic.

Follow this day-by-day agenda, grounded in Afor’s proven delivery playbook, to convert contractual intent into measurable business value.

Read More
1.1: Why Enterprise Test Automation Often Fails: Breaking the Automation Paradox
AI-Enhanced Test Automation Issac @ Shout + Co. AI-Enhanced Test Automation Issac @ Shout + Co.

1.1: Why Enterprise Test Automation Often Fails: Breaking the Automation Paradox

In the realm of software development, test automation is heralded as a catalyst for accelerating delivery cycles and enhancing product quality. Yet, many enterprises encounter an "automation paradox," where, despite substantial investments, automation impedes rather than expedites releases. This conundrum arises when the anticipated efficiencies of automation are overshadowed by challenges such as high maintenance burdens, skill shortages, and fragmented efforts. Understanding these obstacles is crucial to transforming test automation from a bottleneck into a strategic asset.

Hit the link below to read more or listen on Spotify

Read More
1.2: Building a Compelling Business Case for Advanced Test Automation: Beyond the ROI Numbers
AI-Enhanced Test Automation Issac @ Shout + Co. AI-Enhanced Test Automation Issac @ Shout + Co.

1.2: Building a Compelling Business Case for Advanced Test Automation: Beyond the ROI Numbers

Inadequate testing can lead to significant delays and defects reaching production, adversely affecting customer satisfaction and brand reputation. For instance, manual testing processes are often time-consuming, delaying software releases and increasing the likelihood of defects slipping through. These defects can result in costly post-release fixes and potential loss of business. ​

Hit the link below to read more or listen on Spotify

Read More
1.3: Traditional vs. AI-Enhanced Test Automation – A Pragmatic Comparison
AI-Enhanced Test Automation Issac @ Shout + Co. AI-Enhanced Test Automation Issac @ Shout + Co.

1.3: Traditional vs. AI-Enhanced Test Automation – A Pragmatic Comparison

In today’s software testing landscape, artificial intelligence is being positioned as the next big leap forward. Many vendors claim their AI-driven testing tools can solve everything from brittle test cases to laborious test creation. Buzzwords like "self-healing scripts," "intelligent test generation," and "autonomous QA" dominate whitepapers and webinars alike.

But here’s the truth: most AI solutions in test automation are still experimental. They're not magic wands—they’re tools that require thoughtful strategy, strong engineering foundations, and careful integration.

Hit the link below to read more or listen on Spotify

Read More
1.4: Implementing AI-Enhanced Test Automation: A Strategic Roadmap for Success
AI-Enhanced Test Automation Issac @ Shout + Co. AI-Enhanced Test Automation Issac @ Shout + Co.

1.4: Implementing AI-Enhanced Test Automation: A Strategic Roadmap for Success

Transitioning from evaluating AI-enhanced test automation to actual implementation is a pivotal step for organisations aiming to improve software quality and delivery speed. This phase demands a strategic approach that encompasses technology selection, skill development, process integration, and organisational change management. Without a well-defined strategy, initiatives may falter, leading to increased costs and suboptimal outcomes. This article outlines a comprehensive roadmap to guide IT Directors, QA Managers, and CIOs through the successful implementation of AI-enhanced test automation.

Hit the link below to read more or listen on Spotify

Read More
1.5: Measuring Test Automation Success: Key Metrics That Demonstrate Business Value
AI-Enhanced Test Automation Issac @ Shout + Co. AI-Enhanced Test Automation Issac @ Shout + Co.

1.5: Measuring Test Automation Success: Key Metrics That Demonstrate Business Value

One of the biggest gaps I see in test automation initiatives isn’t the technology - it’s the measurement. Too often, teams are tracking pass/fail rates or code coverage without ever linking those numbers back to what really matters: business value, delivery confidence, and customer impact.

After 20+ years in software testing, I’ve learned that true automation success is measured in outcomes - faster releases, fewer production defects, reduced rework, and happier users. And yet, so many organisations still struggle to quantify this.

Hit the link below to read more or listen on Spotify

Read More